The Works of John Locke, Esq

God immovable, because infinite, 13 2. §. 21.
Fills Immenfity as well as Eternity,79.§.3.
His Duration not like that of the Crea-
tures, 82. §. 12.

An Idea of God not innate, 24. §. E.
The Existence of a God evident, and
obvious to Reafon, ibid. §. 9.
The Notion of a God once got, is the like-
lieft to spread and be continu'd, 25.
§. 9, 10.

Idea of God late and imperfect, 26. §. 13.
Contrary, 27. §. 15.
Inconfiftent, ibid. §. 15.

The best Notions of God got by Thought
and Application, ibid. S. 15.
Notions of God frequently not worthy of
him, 27. S. 16.

The Being of a God certain, ibid.

How 'tis fo, p. 370, 371.
As evident as that the three Angles of a
Triangle are equal to two right ones, 30.
$ 22. Yea, as that two oppofite An-
gles are equal, p. 27. §. 16.
The Being of a God demonftrable, 290,
291. S. I, 6.
More certain than any other Existence
without us, 291. §. 6.
The Idea of God not the only Proof of his
Existence, 292. §. 7. p. 366, &c.
The Being of a God the Foundation of
Morality and Divinity, 292. S. 7.
The Belief of it fo, tho' it arife not to
ftrict Knowledg, 478, &c.

How far general Confent proves it, $74.
Not material, 293. §. 13, &c. p. 562.
How we make our Idea of God, 135.
S. 33, 34.

Gold is fixed; the various fignification
of this Propofition, 215. S. 50.
Water ftrain'd through it, 42. S. 4.
Good and Evil, what,95.§.2. p. 108. §.42.
The greater Good determines not the Will,
106, &c. §. 35, 38, 44.
Why, 109. S. 44, 46. p. 115. $. 59,
60, 64, 65, 68.
Twofold, 115. S. 61.

Works on the Will only by Defire, 110.
§. 46.

Defire of Good how to be raised,ib.§.46,47.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Argon how are apoided, p. 544
Ice and Water, whether diftinct Spe-
and
cies, 204. S. 13.
Idea, what, 47. §. 8. p. 376.

Ideas, their Original in Children, 22.§.2.
p. 26. §. 13.

None innate, 27. §. 17.

Because not remember'd, 28. S. 20.
Are what the Mind is imploy'd about in
thinking, 32. §. 1.

All from Senfation or Reflection,ib.§.2.&c.
How this is to be understood, 347:
Their way of getting, obfervable in Chil-
drën, 33. §. 6.

Why Some have more, fome fewer Ideas,
ibid. §. 7.

Of Reflection got late, and in fome very
negligently, 34. §. 8.

Their Beginning and Increase in Children,
38. S. 21, 22, 23, 24..
Their Original in Senfation andReflection,
38. S. 24.
Of one Senfe, 40. §. i.
Want Names, 41. §. 2.
Of more than one Senfe, 43.
Of Reflection, 43. §. I.

Of Senfation and Reflection, 44.
As in the Mind, and in Things, muft
be diftinguifh'd, 47. §. 7.
Not always Refemblances, 48. §. 15,&c.
Yet more than Names, 529.

Which are firft, is not material to know,
52.0.7.

Of Senfation often alter'd by the Fudg-
ment, ibid. §. 8.

Principally thofe of Sight, 53. §.9.
Of Reflection, 61. §. 14.
Simple Ideas Men agree in, 70. S. 28.
Move in a regular Train in our Minds,

Idea; our Complex Idea of God and other
Spirits common in every thing, but Infi-
nity, 136. §. 36.
Clear and obfcure, 160. §. 2.
Diftinct and confused, 161. §. 4.
May be clear in one part, and obfcure in
another, 163. §. 13.
Real and fantastical, 165. §. 1.
Simple are all real, 165. S. 2.
And adequate, 167. §. 2.

What Idea of mixed Modes are fantafti-
cal, 166. §.4.

What Idea of Subftances are fantastical,

166. §. 5.

Adequate and Inadequate, 166. §. 1.
How faid to be in things, 167. §. 2.
Modes are all Adequate Ideas, 167. §. 3.
Unless as refer'd to Names, 168. §• 4, 5·
Of Subftances Inadequate, 170. §. II.
1. As refer'd to real Effences, 168. §. 6,7-
2. As refer'd to a Collection of Simple
Ideas, 169. §. 8.

Simple Ideas are perfect enlumα, 170.§.12.
Of Subftances are perfect enluπα, 171.§.13.
Of Modes are perfect Archetypes,ib. §.14.
True or falfe, 171.

When falfe, 175,&c. §. 21, 22, 23, 24, 25.
As bare Appearances in the Mind, neither
true nor falfe, 172. §. 3.

'As refer'd to other Meus Ideas, or to real
Exiftence, or to real Effences, may be
true or falfe, ibid. §. 4, 5..
The Reafon of fuch Reference, 172.§.6,7,8.
Simple Ideas refer'd to other Mens Ideas,
leaft apt to be falfe, 173. §.9.
Complex ones in this refpect more apt to
be falfe, especially thofe of mixed
Modes, 173. §. II.

Simple Ideas refer'd to Existence are all
true, 173. §. 14, 16.

Tho' they should be different in different
Men, 174. S. 15.

Complex Ideas of Modes are all true, 174.

S. 17.

Of Subftances when falfe, 175. §.21,&c.
When right or wrong, 176. §. 26.
That we are uncapable of, 257. §. 23.
That we cannot attain, because of their

Remoteness, 258. §. 24.
Because of their Minutenefs, ibid. S. 25.
Simple have a real Conformity to things,

262. $.4

"And all others but of Subftances, ibid. §.5.
Simple cannot be got by words of Defini-

tions, 192. S. II.

But only by Experience, 193. S. 14.
Of mixed Modes, why most compounded,
198. §. 13.
Specifick of mixed Modes, how at firft
made: Inftance in Kinneah and
Niouph, 213. 5. 44, 45.

Of Subftances: inftance in Zahab, 214.
S. 47
Simple Ideas and Modes have all abstract
as well as concrete Names, 217. §. 2.
Of Subftances have scarce any concrete
Names, 218. §. 2.

Different in different Men, 221. §. 13.
Our Ideas almost all relative, 97. §. 3.
Particular are firft in the Mind,278.§.9.
General are imperfect, ibid.
How pofitive Ideas may be from priva-
tive Caufes, 46. §. 4.

The Ufe of this Term not dangerous, 402,
&c. 'Tis fitter than the word Nation,
404. Other words as liable to be a-
bus'd as this, ibid. Tet'tis condemn'd
both as new and not new, 406, 437.
The fame with Notion, Senfe, Mean-
ing, &c. 503. Their Connection may
be clear, tho' they are not wholly fo,
524, 525. They are not the things
whereof they are Ideas, 525. The
Author never fpeaks of self-evident

Ideas, 537.

Identical Propofitions teach nothing,285.§.2.
Identity, not an innate Idea, 23. §.3, 4, 5.
And Diverfity, 142.

Of a Plant wherein it confifts, 144. §. 4.
Of Animals, ibid. §. 5.
Of a Man, 144. §. 6, 8.
Unity of Subftance does not always make
the fame Idea, ibid. §. 7.
Perfonal Idea, 146. §. 9.
Requires not the fame Body, 496, &c.
Depends on the fameConfcioufnefs, ib.§.10.
Continued Existence makes Identity, 153.
S. 29.

And Diverfity in Ideas the firft Percep-
tion of the Mind, 243. §.4.
Ideots and Madmen, 60. §. 12, 13.
Ignorance, our Ignorance infinitely exceeds
our Knowledg, 257. §. 22.
Caufes of Ignorance, ibid. §. 23.
1. For want of Ideas, ibid.

2. For want of a difcoverable Connection
between the Ideas we have, 259. §. 28.
3. For want of tracing the Ideas we have,
261. §. 30.
Illation, what, 315. §. 2.
Immenfity, 63. §. 4.

How this Idea is got, 85. §. 3.
Immoralitie,of whole Nations, 15. §.9, 10:
Immortality not annexed to any Shape,265.
S. 15.
Impenetrability. 41. §. I.
Impofition of Opinions unreasonable 3 11.§.4.
Impoffibile eft Idem effe & non effe, not
the first thing known, 11. §. 25.
Impoffibility, not an innate Idea, 23. §.3.
Impreffion on the Mind, what, 4. §. 5.
Inadequate Ideas, 166. §. 1.

Incompatibility, how far knowable, 254.

$ 15.

Individuationis Principium, is Existence,
143. §. 3.

Infallible Judg of Controverfies, 25. §. 12.
Inference, what, 315. §. 2, 3, 4.
Infinite, why the Idea of Infinite not appli-
cable to other Ideas, as well as thofe of
Quantity, fince they can be as often re-
peated, 86. §. 6.

The Idea of Infinity of Space or Number,
and of Space or Number Infinite, must
be diftinguifh'd, 87. §. 7.

Our Idea of Infinite very obfcure, ib. §. 8.
Number furnishes us with the clearest
Ideas of Infinite, 88. §. 9.

The Idea of Infinite a growing Idea,ib.§.12.
Our Idea of Infinite partly pofitive, partly

comparative,partly negative,89. §. 15.
Why fome Men think they have an Idea
of infinite Duration, but not of infi-
nite Space, 91. §. 20.
Why Disputes about Infinite are usually
perplexed, ibid. §. 21.

Our Idea of Infinity has its Original in
Senfation and Reflection, 92. §. 22.
We have no pofitive Idea of Infinite, 88.
§. 13, 14. P. 90. §. 16.
Infinity, why more commonly allowed to Du-

ration, than to Expanfion, 79. §. 4.
How apply'd to God by us, 85. §. 1.
How we get this Idea, ibid. §. 2, 3.
The Infinity of Number, Duration, and
Space, different ways confider'd, 82.
§. 10, II.
Innate Truths must be the first known II.§.26.
Principles to no purpose, if Men can be ig-

norant or doubtful of them, 17. §. 13.
Principles of my Lord Herbert examin'd,
18. §. 15, &c.

Moral Rules to no purpose, if effaceable
or alterable, 20. §. 20.
Propofitions must be diftinguish'd from o-
thers by their Clearness and Usefulness,
29. §. 21.

The Doctrine of Innate Principles of ill
Confequence, 31. . 24.
Inftant, what, 72. §. 10.

And continual Change, 73. §. 13, 14,15.
Intelligibly, how to speak or write fo, 544.
Intuitive Knowledg, 246. §. 1.

Our higheft Certainty, 315. . 14.
Invention, wherein it confifts, 56. . 8.
Joy, 96. §.7.

Iron, of what Advantage to Mankind,304.
S. 11.
Judgment, wrong Judgments in reference
to Good and Evil, 114. §.58.
Right Judgment, ibid.

One Cause of wrong Judgment, 310,§.3.
Wherein it confifts, 307.

Nowledg has a great Connection with
Words, 233. §. 25.

KNO

The Author's Definition of it explain'd
and defended, 410. How it differs
from Faith, ibid. His Definition of
it leads not to Scepticism, 509, &c.
What, 243. §. 2.

How much our Knowledg depends on our
Senfes, 241. §. 23.
Actual, 244. §. 8.
Habitual, 244. §. 8.
Habitual twofold, 244. §. 9.
Intuitive, 246. §. 1.
Intuitive the clearest, ibid.
Intuitive, irrefiftible, ibid.
Demonftrative, 246. §. 2.

Of general Truths, is all either intuitive
or demonftrative, 249. §. 14.
Of particular Existences is fenfitive,ibid.
Clear Ideas do not always produce clear
Knowledg, 249. §. 15.

What kind of Knowledg we have of Na-
ture, 129. . 12.

Its beginning and progress, 61. §. 15,
16, 17. p. 71. §. 15, 16.
Given us in the Faculties to attain it, 25.
S. 12.

Mens Knowledg according to the Imploy-

ment of their Faculties, 30. §. 22.
To be got only by the Application of our
own Thought to the Contemplation of
things, ibid. §. 23.

Extent of Human Knowledg, 250.
Our Knowledg goes not beyond our Ideas,
ibid. §. I.

Nor beyond the Perception of their Agree-
ment or Difagreement, ibid. §. 2.
Reaches not to all our Ideas, 250.0.3.
Much less to the Reality of things, ib. §.6.
Tet very improvable, if right ways were
taken, 230. §. 6.

Of Co-exiftence very narrow, 252, &c.
§. 9, 10, 11.

And therefore of Subftances very narrow,
253, &c. §. 14, 15, 16.

Of other Relations indeterminable, 255.
§. 18.

Of Existence, 257. §. 21.

Certain and univerfal, where to be had,
260. §. 29.

10 use of Words a great hindrance of
Knowledg, 261. §. 30.
General, where to be got, 261. §. 31.
Lies only in our Thoughts, 275. §. 13.
Reality of our Knowledg, 261.

Of Mathematical Truths, how real, 263.

Knowledg of Substances, how far real,264.
S. 12.

What makes our Knowledg real, 262.

S. 3. p. 263. S. 8.
Confidering Things, and not Names, the
way to Knowledg, 265. §. 13.
Of Subftances, wherein it confifts, 272.
S. 10.

What required to any tolerable Knowledg
of Subftances, 275. §. 14.
Self-evident, 276. §. 2.

Of Identity and Diverfity, as large as
our Ideas, 252. §. 8. p. 277. §. 4.
Wherein it confifts, ibid.

Of Co-existence very fcanty, 278. S. 5.

Belongs not to the Will, 100. §. 14.
To be determin'd by the Result of our own
Deliberation, is no Restraint of Liberty,
III. § 48, 49, 50.

Founded in a Power of suspending our par-

ticular Defires, 1 10. §. 47, 51, 52.
Light, its abfurd Definitious, 191. §. 10.
Light in the Mind, what, 333. §. 13.
Logick has introduc'd Obfcurity into Lan-
guages, 227. §. 6.
And hinder'd Knowledg, ibid. §. 7.
Love, 95. §.4.

Of Relations of Modes not fo feanty,ib.6. Madness, 60,§. 13. Oppofition to Rea-

Of real Exiftence none, ibid. §. 7.
Begins in Particulars, 278. §. 9.
Intuitive of our own Existence, 290. § 2.
Demonftrative of a God, ibid. §. 1.
Improvement of Knowledg, 300.
Not improv'd by Maxims, 243. §. 3.
Why fo thought, 243. §. 2.
Knowledg improv'd only by perfecting and

comparing Ideas, 302. §6. p.305.§.14.
And finding their Relations, 302. §. 7.
By intermediate Ideas, 305. §. 14.
In Subftances how to be improved,302.§.7.
Partly neceffary, partly voluntary, 306.
S. 1, 2.

Why fome, and fo little, ibid. S. 2.
How increafed, 312. §. 6.

Anguages, why they change, 123. §.7.
Wherein it confifts, 181. §. 1, 2, 3.
Its Ufe, 196. §. 7....

Its Imperfections, 226. §. I.
Double Ufe, 226. §. i.

The Ufe of Language deftroy'd by the
Subtilty of Difputing, 228. §. 10, 11.
Ends of Language, 233. §. 23.

Its Imperfections not eafy to be cured,235.
S. 2, 4, 5, 6.

The Cure of them neceflary to Philofophy,
235. §. 3.
Toufe no word without a clear and diftinct
Idea annex'd to it,is, one Remedy of the
Imperfections of Language, 237.§. 8,9.
Propriety in the Ufe of Words, another

Remedy, 238. §. II.
Law of Nature generally allow'd, 14. §. 6.
There is, tho' not innate, 17. §. 13.
Its inforcement, 154. 9.6.
Learning, the ill ftate of Learning in thefe
later Ages, 226, &c.

Of the Schools lies chiefly in the Abuse of
Words, 226, &c. A

Such Learning of ill Confequence, 228.

S. 10, &c.

Liberty, what, 99. §. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
p. 101. §. 15.

fon deferves that Name,177.§.4.
Magifterial. The most knowing are leaft
Magifterial, 311. §. 4.

Making, 141. §. 2.

Man not the Product of blindChance,291.§.6.
The Effence of Man is placed in his Shape,
266. §. 16.

We know not his real Effence, 200. §. 3.

p. 205. §. 22. p. 207. §. 27.
The Boundaries of the human Species nat
determined, ibid. §. 27.

What makes the fame individual Man,
150. §. 21. p. 153. §. 29.
The fame Man may be different Perfons,

149. §. 19.
Mathematicks, their Methods, 302. §. 7.

Improvement, 305. §. 15. Of the ufe
of them in Natural Philofophy, 542.
Matter incomprehenfible both in its Cohefion
and Divifibility, 132. §. 23. p. 134.
§. 30, 31.
What, 229. §. i5.

Whether it may think, is not to be known,
251. §. 6. p. 557—564.

The Credibility of Divine Revelation not
leffen'd by fuppofing it poffible,564,565.
Cannot produce Motion, or any thing else,
292. S. 10.

And Motion cannot produce Thought, ib.
Not Eternal, 295. §. 18.

Maxims, 276,&c. p. 283. §. 12,13,14,15.
The Author denies not the Certainty of
them, 517. He allows them to be of
fome ufe, 519.

Not alone felf-evident, 276. §. 3.
Are not the Truths first known, 278. §.
Not the Foundation of our Knowledg,279.

S. 10.

Wherein their Evidence confifts, ibid.
S. 10. p. 305. S. 14.
Their Ufe, 279. S. 11. 12.
Why the most general felf-evident Propofi-

tions alone pafs for Maxims, ib. §. 11.
Are commonly Proofs only where there is

no need of Proofs, 284. §. 15.
Of little Ufe with clear Terms,285. S. 19.
Maxims

Maxims of dangerous Ufe without doubtful
Terms, 283. §. 12, 20.

When first known, 5. §. 9, 12, 13. p. 7.
S. 14, 16.

How they gain Affent, 19. §. 21, 22.
Made from particular Obfervations, ib.
Not in the Understanding, before they are
actually known, 9. §. 22.

Neither their Terms nor Ideas innate, 10.
S. 23.

Leaft known to Children and illiterate
People, 11. §. 27.
Memory, 55. S. 2.

Attention, Pleasure, and Pain, fettle Ideas
in the Memory, ibid. §. 3.
And Repetition, ibid. §. 4. p. 56. §. 6.
Memory,

Hindrances of demonftrative treating of
Morality. 1. Want of Marks. 2.
Complexedness, 259. §. 19. 3. In-
tereft, 256. §. 20.

Change of Names in Morality changes
not the Nature of things, 263. §. 9.
And Mechanifm hard to be reconciled, 18.
S. 14.

Secur'd amidft Mens wrong Judgments,
119. §. 70.

Motion, flow or very Swift, why not per-
ceiv'd, 72. §. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.
Voluntary, inexplicable, 295. S. 19.
Its abfurd Definitions, 191. S. 8, 9.

Difference of Men 5 Mind Jometimes NAming of Ideas, 59. §. 8.

active, fometimes paffive, 56. S. 7.
Its Neceffity, ibid. §. 8.
Defects, 56. S. 8, 9.
In Brutes, 57. S. 10.
Metaphyfick, and School Divinity fill'd

with uninftructive Propofitions, 288.§.9.
Method used in Mathematicks, 302. S. 7.
Mind, the Quickness of its Actions,53. S. 10.
Minutes, Hours, Days, not necessary to

Duration, 75. S. 23.

Miracles, the Ground of Affent to Mira-
cles, 314. S. 13.
Mifery, what, 108. §. 42.
Modes, mixed Modes, 122. §. 1.
Made by the Mind, ibid. §. 2.
Sometimes got by the Explication of their
Names, 123. §. 3.

Whence a mix'dMode has itsUnity,ib.§.4.
Occafion of mixed Modes, 123. §. 5.
Mixed Modes, their Ideas, how got, 124.
$.9.

Modes Simple and Complex, 62. §. 4.
Simple Modes, 63. §. I.

of Motion, 92. §. 2.
Moral Good and Evil, what, 154. S.
Three Rules whereby Men judg of Moral
Rectitude, ibid. §. 7.
Beings, how founded on fimple Ideas of
Senfation and Reflection, 158.S. 14,15.
Rules not felf-evident, 14. §. 4.
Variety of Opinions concerning Moral

Rules, whence, 14. §. 5, 6.
Rules, if innate, cannot with publick Al-
lowance be tranfgrefsed, 16, &c. §. 11,

12, 13.

Morality capable of Demonftration, 239.

S. 16. p. 255. S. 18. p. 302. S. 8.
The proper ftudy of Mankind, 304. §.11.
Of Actions in their Conformity to a Rule,
158. §. 15.

Miftakes in Moral Notions owing to
Names, ibid. §. 16.
Difcourfes in Morality, if not clear, 'tis
the Fault of the Speaker, 239. §. 17.
Vol. I.

Names Moral eftablish'd by Law, are not
to be varied from, 264. §. 10.
Of Subftances ftanding for real Effences,
are not capable to convey Certainty to
the Understanding, 271. §. 5.
Standing for nominal Effences, will make
fome, tho' not many certain Propof-
tions, ibid. §. 6.

Why Men fubftitute Names for real Ef

fences, which they know not, 231. §. 19.
Two falfe Suppofitions in fuch an Use of
Names, 232. §. 21.

A particular Name to every particular
thing, impoffible, 184. §. 2.
And ufelefs, ibid. §. 3.

Proper Names where used, 185. §. 4, 5.
Specifick Names are affixed to the nomi-
nal Effence, 189. §. 16.

of fimple Ideas and Substances, refer to
things, 190. §. 2.

What Names ftand for both real and no
minal Effence, ibid. §.
Of fimple Ideas not capable of Definitions,
ibid. §. 4.
Why, 191. S. 7.

Of leaft doubtful Signification, 193.§. 15.
Have few Afcents in linea prædicamen-
tali, 194. §. 16.

Of complex Ideas may be defined, 193.§.12.
Of mixed Modes ftand for arbitrary Ideas,

194. §. 2, 3. p. 213. S. 44.

Tie together the Parts of their complex
Ideas, 197. S. 10.

Stand always for the real Effence, 198♪

« Forrige Fortsæt »

Bøger

The Works of John Locke, Esq, Bind 1