Billeder på siden
PDF
ePub

The

Catholic Miscellany;

AND MONTHLY

REPOSITORY OF INFORMATION,

FOR MAY, 1823.

BIOGRAPHY.

FRANCIS TREGIAN,

WHOSE extraordinary and long sufferings for the cause of religion, have been noticed by cardinal Allen, and minutely detailed by Dodd, was of noble extraction, both by the side of his father and of his mother; for his father was descended from a family ancient and respectable in Cornwall, even before the conquest. His great grandmother was the daughter of Thomas Gray, marquis of Dorchester, half-brother to Elizabeth, daughter of king Edward the fourth, and wife of king Henry the seventh; and his mother was the eldest sister of sir John Arundel, of Lanhern. At an early age he married the eldest sister of lord Stourton, and being possessed of considerable property, was remarkable for his hospitality; he was also strictly religious, and he zealously maintained the faith of his ancestors. But like many great and good men he had his enemies; and some of these informing against him as a recusant, a warrant for his apprehension was, in 1577, issued out. He was at that time twenty-eight years old, and on the 8th of June his house was entered by the sheriff of the county, with eight or nine justices of the peace, and upwards of a hundred armed men, who took him away by force, together with the reverend Cuthbert Mayne his chaplain, and several of his domestics." They were hurried away to Truro, where the bishop of Exeter had a seat; and Mr. Tregian was obliged by the justices

of the peace, to give a bond of two thousand pounds for his personal appearance at the next assizes, but before these came on, an order arrived to have him brought before the queen's privy council; he was therefore taken to London, and remained in confinement, until it pleased the council to examine him : when brought before them he was charged with recusancy, with entertaining persons of a suspicious character in his family, and of countenancing superstitious practices. He frankly owned the charge of recusancy, but at the same time assured the council, that he did not absent himself from the Protestant church, out of any civil affection to the queen or government, but entirely from a principal of conscience. At the breaking up of the sitting, sir Francis Walsingham told him, that he was not to be discharged as yet, for that other informations from the country were expected against him. He was nevertheless treated with civility, and the earl of Essex invited him to dinner, advising him at the same time to appear once at church, with the assurance, that if he followed this advice, all further prosecution should cease, and that he might expect to be admitted among the favourites of the queen. Mr. Tregian, however, remained firm to his principles, and the council at length obtaining the following allegation against him, "That he had been present at mass; that he had received an agnus dei and jubilee from the bishop of Rome; that he had abetted and entertained those who had asserted the pope's supremacy." He was committed a close prisoner to the Marshalsea, where he was confined ten months, and was not permitted, during the whole of that time, to hold any correspondence with his family; his temporal concerns consequently fell into a very deranged state, and his property suffered considerable waste; one person, named Brandore, a goldsmith of London, to whom he was indebted seventy pounds, learning his perilous situation, and fearing the loss of his debt, went down to Golden, and made a seizure of his goods, to the value of five hundred pounds, and before the goods could be replevied, Mrs. Tregian was obliged to pay to this creditor two hundred pounds, upon account of the debt, and of the incidental expences incurred. An application was made by Mr. Tregian's council, that he should be tried in the court of King's Bench, but this was refused, and he

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

was sent into the country to take his trial at Lancaster Assizes. The queen's council endeavoured to charge him with the several indictments upon which his chaplain, Mr. Mayne, had already been convicted and executed. Their chief evidence was one Twig, a strolling fiddler, who had been admitted into Mr. Tregian's family during the Christmas holydays, to amuse his tenants and neighbours. This man deposed that he had sometimes seen Mr. Tregian go into Mr. Mayne's chamber, and remain there about an hour, which he conjectured to be the time while Mr. Mayne was saying mass; that during the Christmas of 1575, he was Mr. Mayne's bed-fellow, who owned himself to him to be a priest, and that he had brought a number of Agnus Dei's from Rome. Mr. Tregian proved in his defence, that Twig, from several questions which he put to him, was unacquainted with Mr. Mayne's chamber; this however was considered by the queen's counsel as immaterial; he then put it to the bench if it were probable that Mr. Mayne, a prudent and cautious man, should be so indiscreet as to own himself a priest, to a stranger and a vagabond; or that a common fiddler should be made a bedfellow to one of Mr. Mayne's character. Again, he alledged that Twig had perjured himself as to circumstances both of time and place; he had sworn to Christmas, 1575, whereas Mr. Mayne was then at Doway, and did not arrive in England until the Easter following, and that he had never, in the whole course of his life, been at Rome. These particulars he could prove by forty witnesses; but as they were not then in court, the judges said that it was a frivolous thing to mention them, and that the trial could not be put off. While the jury were out consulting upon their verdict, Mr. Tregian was again strenuously pressed to conform so far as to appear in church, and the same promise was held out that all further proceedings should be stopped. He however persisted in his former refusal, and the jury returning into court, found him guilty of being present at mass; of recusancy; of entertaining one who had maintained the pope's supremacy; 'of receiving and dispensing Agnus Dei's, &c. Judgment was not then given, and on the following assizes many reasons were urged by his counsel why judgment should not pass; among other things it was insisted upon, that the proofs offered were

a dozen Catholic peers cannot safely be restored to the ancient hereditary privilege of a share in framing those laws to which their persons, their property, and their lives, are amenable.”

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Sir,-Allow me to ask, through the medium of your useful Miscellany, What is the meaning of the term, " Festum in pop," as marked in the Ordo Recitandi, for March 25th, 1823. I am, Sir, your's respectfully, D.

ZEEEEE

H©KEEEEEEEEE

MONTHLY INTELLIGENCE

THE CATHOLIC QUESTION: On the 17th instant, the debate in the House of Commons on the atho lic claims came on, but tinated in a way quite unexpected by the supporters of that measure as well as the Catholics themselves. For several days petitions against the claims had been pouring in from the clergy of different districts in England, and the orange towns of the north of Ireland. On the above evening sir. T. Lethbridge presented one from the rev. sir Harcourt Lees, which, among other things, prayed the house might order an account to be taken of the number of Papists, and reputed Papists, their character, conduct, property, estates, chapels, nunneries, and territorial establishments.-A prayer, said the hon. baronet, which I consider most reasonable.

Mr. Coke presented a petition from several of the clergy of the established church, of the diocess of Norwich, in favour of the Catholic claims. He was happy to say that the petition was signed by a greater number of clergymen than a similar one which he had presented last year. The petition of

last year was signed by 48, the present by 55. The petition was so beautifully worded, that he should move that it be read; which being done,

Sir F. Burdett said he rose to give utterance to his feelings on this subject, and to express his dissatisfaction at the annual farce carried on year after year, for a great length of time, and conducive to no purpose whatever but that of sowing the seeds of well grounded dissatisfaction in the minds of a large portion of the community. He then entered into the anomalous formation of the cabinet respecting this question, and stated his determination to take no part in that farce concerning the Catholics which the house was this night called upon to perform.

Lord Nugent expressed his hearty concurrence in all the general reasoning of Sir Francis, but considered the course he was going to pursue injurious to the cause of the Catholics.

Mr. Canning spoke in support of his own conduct; he thought, from what had fallen, the question would be greatly prejudiced by bringing it forward that night, and therefore ad

vised his right hon. friend not to bring it on.

Mr. Tierney, Mr. Wynn, Mr. G. Bennett, Mr. Peel, and Mr. Broughham made some observations. The latter gentleman in the course of his speech, was making some very pointed and sarcastic remarks on Mr. Canning's political conduct, when Mr. C. started up and said, "I rise to say that that is false."-A profound si lence pervaded the house; Mr. Brougham appeared to be retiring from the house, when the Speaker called to order. A long debate ensued on the conduct of Mr. Canning, which was ended by mutual explanations between the parties. The petition was then ordered to lie on the table and to be printed.

At the moment when the Speaker called on Mr. Plunkett to bring on his motion, several of the leading members of the opposition rose from their seats and left the house, among whom were, Sir F. Burdett, the earl of Sefton, lord Folkstone, Edward Ellice, esq. sir R. Wilson, J. C. Hobhouse, esq. Mr. Hume, hon. H. G. Bennett, sir R. Fergusson, Peter Moore, esq. lord F. Osborne, T. Creevy, esq. and Mr. Coke.

Mr. Plunkett then rose, and after a speech of some length and little interest, moved, "That this House do resolve into a Committee of the whole House, to consider of the state of the laws by which oaths and declarations are required to be taken as a qualification for the enjoyment of office, or the exercise of civil functions, so far as regards his majesty's Roman Catholic subjects, and whether it is expedient and in what manner, to alter and modify the same, and subject to what provisions and regulations."

On the question being put from the chair, Mr. Bankes, the new member for Cambridge, opposed the motion in a tone of voice so low as to be scarcely audible in the gallery.

Mr. Becher rose, amidst loud cries of adjourn, adjourn. He supported

the motion as being the only measure which could give permanent peace and security to Ireland.

Mr. Lambton, in rising, was for a short time interrupted by cries of "question, question!" "adjourn, ad journ!" He observed, that if those gentlemen who were so clamorous be low the bar, had but been silent for one minute, he should have delivered all he meant to say upon this question. His only object in rising was to prevent his constituents and the count try generally from mistaking the motives which actuated him in giving his vote. All he intended to say at present was, that he voted against the present motion not in consequence of any change of opinion upon this point, but because he conceived, from the manner in which the question was brought forward by the right honour able the attorney-general for Ireland, it was a gross deception upon the Rot man Catholics, and one to which he never would accede. (Hear hear, mixed with loud and repeated cries of "Question, question.”— Adjourn, ad journ."."—" Clear the Gallery, &c.") The House then divided that this question be adjourned till to-morrow. When there appeared, for the adjournment of the question, 134, against it, 292, majority 158.

The adjournment of the House was then moved, when the numbers were, for the adjournment, 313, against it, 111, majority, 202.

And at half-past one the House adjourned.

By this decision the question has been got rid of, but may be brought forward again this session.

On the succeeding night, general Gascoyne asked Mr. Plunkett if he intended to renew the question this session, and was answered in the negative.

Lord Nugent has subsequently given notice that on the 2nd of May, he should bring forward a motion to put the English Catholics on an equal footing with those of Ireland.

« ForrigeFortsæt »