Billeder på siden
PDF
ePub

the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad*." I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus t.”

66

The same principle is recognised in those appeals to our love of personal happiness which are so abundant in scripture. "Whosoever will save his life shall lose it; and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it. For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Or, what shall a man give in exchange for his soul ‡ ?” "Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do. But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear fear him, who after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, fear him §."

But in what does the principle here recognised and recommended differ from utility? Does not the former as well as the latter require us to seek by strenuous and persevering exertion a personal advantage, a reward of the greatest magnitude? According to the doctrine of expediency, the strength of an obligation to an action or line of conduct is in proportion to the gain which is to accrue from it. "We can be obliged to nothing," says Paley," but what we ourselves are to gain or lose something by: for nothing else can be a violent motive to us. As we should not be obliged to obey the laws, or the magistrate, unless rewards or punishments, pleasure or pain, somehow or other, depended upon our obedience; so neither should we,

* 2 Cor. v. 9, 10.

+ Philip iii. 14. § Luke xii. 4, 5.

Matt. xvi. 26.

without the same reason, be obliged to do what is right, to practise virtue, or to obey the commands of God*."

[ocr errors]

When it is recollected what the doctrine of expediency really is, that it resolves the virtue or worth of moral actions into their tendency to procure some benefit to ourselves or others, that it rests the obligation to obey the commands of God on the gain which obedience brings, and that it authorizes us to violate the most express laws of God, when we can induce ourselves to think that their violation will bring us greater benefit than their observance; it is surely not necessary to make many observations to prove, that the promise of reward, held forth in the gospel, to persevering faith and obedience, is totally different.

In what does that promised reward consist? In the case supposed, that is, in regard to mankind, it consists in deliverance from sin, and in the everlasting possession of all the happiness of which our nature is capable. To be perfectly virtuous, is to be perfectly meet for the enjoyment of that happiness which virtue ever yields. Is not this a good of incalculable value, the magnitude of which is to be estimated, not merely by its eternal duration, but by its perpetual accumulation? That it is in itself an object of supreme desire, and that it justly ought to be so, no one can doubt. But in this desire, however intense, when indulged aright, there is nothing selfish, nothing at variance with the disinterested love of God and of man which is the fulfilling of the law :-there is nothing

-

* Vol. i. p. 60.

the things one in his body, according to that he hath tone, whether it be good or bad." "I press toward De park ir the prize of the high calling of God in

The same propie is recognised in those appeals 2 trave i personal happiness which are so abun- Whosoever will save his life

[ocr errors]

1. and viscerer will lose his life for my

sae zalina 1. For what is a man prifted, if he

eve wind and lose his own soul?

Ir. von full a man que in exchange for his soul?" emmat kill the body, and after that

-3

Hemm my mix I will forewarn

bar. hc after he hath

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

without the same reason, be obliged to do what is right, to practise virtue, or to obey the commands of God*."

When it is recollected what the doctrine of expediency really is, that it resolves the virtue or worth of moral actions into their tendency to procure some benefit to ourselves or others,-that it rests the obligation to obey the commands of God on the gain which obedience brings, and that it authorizes us to violate the most express laws of God, when we can induce ourselves to think that their violation will bring us greater benefit than their observance; it is surely not necessary to make many observations to prove, that the promise of reward, held forth in the gospel, to persevering faith and obedience, is totally different.

In what does that promised reward consist? In the case supposed, that is, in regard to mankind, it consists in deliverance from sin, and in the everlasting possession of all the happiness of which our nature is capable. To be perfectly virtuous, is to be perfectly meet for the enjoyment of that happiness which virtue ever yields. Is not this a good of incalculable value, the magnitude of which is to be estimated, not merely by its eternal duration, but by its perpetual accumulation? That it is in itself an object of su›reme desire, and that it justly ought to be so, no one in doubt. But in this desire, however intense, when dulged aright, there is nothing selfish, nothing at riance with the disinterested love of God and of an which is the fulfilling of the law :-there is nothing

* Vol. i. p. 60.

akin to the perfect selfishness recommended by the doctrine of expediency.

I. Because our personal happiness is in itself an object of desire, in proportion to its magnitude, as well as the happiness of all other beings who are capable of enjoying happiness. When I say that our personal happiness is in itself an object of desire, I mean to affirm, that it is so, or ought to be so, to others, as well as to us. It is that which God, in our creation, designed to confer upon us, and which he has rendered it a duty in us to seek after. There is, therefore, nothing selfish in the adequate love of ourselves, any more than there is selfishness in desiring that our neighbour should have all the happiness which God has made him capable of enjoying. To pursue it with an ardour and perseverance corresponding to its importance, and to make all temporary interests subservient to our pursuit of this, is so far from being at variance with disinterested benevolence and virtue, that there can be no disinterested benevolence and virtue without it.

In this pursuit we are, indeed, influenced by a concern for the favour of God. But can there exist any thing virtuous, any thing estimable, in any being who has not a supreme regard to the approbation of Him who possesses in himself whatever is lovely and excellent, and a resemblance to whose moral perfec tions, however faint, is itself happiness?

II. In desiring the happiness, the eternal life, promised in the gospel as the reward of faith and obedience, we are desiring what will confer benefit on the

« ForrigeFortsæt »