Billeder på siden
PDF
ePub

thefes, and were fit to support the doctrines of their particular schools or churches; a plain evidence that there are no fuch innate truths: Nay, a great part of men are so far from finding any fuch innate moral principles in themselves, that by denying freedom to mankind, and thereby making men no other than bare machines, they take away not only innate, but all moral rules whatfoever, and leave not a poffibility to believe any fuch, to those who cannot conceive how any thing can be capable of a law that is not a free agent; and upon that ground they muft neceffarily reject all principles of virtue, who cannot put morality and mechanism together, which are not very easy to be reconciled or made confiftent.

§ 15. Lord Herbert's Innate Principles examined. WHEN I had writ this, being informed that my Lord Herbert had, in his books De Veritate, affigned these innate principles, I prefently confulted him, hoping to find in a man of fo great parts fomething that might fatisfy me in this point, and put an end to my inquiry. In his chapter De Inftin&u Naturali, p. 76. edit. 1656, I met with these fix marks of his Notitia Communes. 1. Prioritas. 2. Independentia. 3. Univerfalitas. 4. Certitudo. 5. Neceffitas, i. e. as he explains it, faciunt ad hominis confervationem. 6. Modus conformationis, i. e. Affenfus nulla interpofita mora. And at the latter end of his little treatife De Religione Laici, he fays this of thefe innate principles, " Adeo ut non uniufcujufvis "religionis confinio arctentur quæ ubique vigent veriSunt enim in ipfa mente cœlitus defcriptæ "nullifque traditionibus, five fcriptis, five non fcriptis, ❝ obnoxiæ,” p. 3. And, "Veritates noftræ Catholicæ, quæ tanquam indubia Dei effata in foro interiori de"fcripta." Thus having given the marks of the innate principles or common notions, and afferted their being imprinted on the minds of men by the hand of God, he proceeds to fet them down, and they are thefe : 1. Effe aliquod fupremum Numen. 2. Numen illud coli debere. 3. Virtutem eum pietate conjunctam optimam esse rationem cultus divini. 4. Refipifcendum effe a peccatis..

[ocr errors]

tates.

5. Dari pramium vel pœnam poft hanc vitam tranfactam. Though I allow these to be clear truths, and fuch as, if rightly explained, a rational creature can hardly avoid giving his affent to, yet I think he is far from proving them innate impreffions, in foro interiori deJcripta. For I must take leave to obferve,

§ 16.

First, THAT these five propofitions are either not at all, or more than all those common notions writ on our minds by the finger of God, if it were reasonable to believe any at all to be fo written, fince there are other propofitions which, even by his own rules, have as just a pretence to fuch an original, and may be as well admitted for innate principles, as at least some of these five he enumerates, viz. Do as thou wouldst be done untɔ, and perhaps fome hundreds of others, when well confidered.

$17.

Secondly, THAT all his marks are not to be found in each of his five propofitions, viz. his first, second, and third marks, agree perfectly to neither of them; and the first, fecond, third, fourth, and fixth marks, but ill agree to his third, fourth, and fifth propofitions: For, befides that we are affured from history of many men, nay, whole nations, who doubt or disbelieve fome or all of them, I cannot fee how the third, viz. That virtue joined with piety is the best worship of God, can be an innate principle, when the name or found virtue is fo hard to be understood, liable to fo much uncertainty in its fignification, and the thing it ftands for fo much contended about, and difficult to be known; and therefore this can be but a very uncertain rule of human practice, and serve but very little to the conduct of our lives, and is therefore very unfit to be affigned as an innate practical principle.

$ 18.

FOR let us confider this propofition as to its meaning (for it is the fense and not found that is and must be the principle or common notion), viz. Virtue is the best worship of God, i. e. is moft acceptable to him; which if virtue be taken, as most commonly it is, for those

actions which, according to the different opinions of feveral countries, are accounted laudable, will be a propofition fo far from being certain, that it will not be true. If virtue be taken for actions conformable to God's will, or to the rule prescribed by God, which is the true and only measure of virtue, when virtue is used to fignify what is in its own nature right and good, then this propofition, That virtue is the best worship of God, will be moft true and certain, but of very little use in human life, fince it will amount to no more but this, viz. That God is pleafed with the doing of what he commands, which a man may certainly know to be true, without knowing what it is that God doth command, and fo be as far from any rule or principles of his actions as he was before; and I think very few will take a propofition which amounts to no more than this, viz. that God is pleased with the doing of what he himfelf commands, for an innate moral principle writ on the minds of all men (however true and certain it may be), fince it teaches fo little. Whofoever does fo will have reason to think hundreds of propofitions innate principles, fince there are many which have as good a title to this to be received for fuch, which nobody yet ever put into that rank of innate principles.

19.

NOR is the fourth propofition, viz. Men must repent of their fins, much more inftructive, till what thofe actions are that are meant by fins be fet down; for the word peccata, or fins, being put, as it ufually is, to fignify in general ill actions, that will draw punishment upon the doers, what great principle of morality can that be to tell us we should be forry, and cease to do that which will bring mischief upon us, without knowing what thofe particular actions are that will do fo? Indeed this is a very true propofition, and fit to be inculcated on and received by those who are fuppofed to have been taught what actions in all kinds are fins; but neither this nor the former can be imagined to be innate principles, nor to be of any use if they were innate, unless the particular measures and bounds of all

virtues and vices were engraven in mens minds, and were innate principles alfo, which I think is very much. to be doubted; and therefore I imagine it will scarce feem poffible that God fhould engrave principles in mens minds in words of uncertain fignification, fuch as virtues and fins, which amongst different men stand for different things; nay, it cannot be fuppofed to be in words at all, which, being in most of these principles very general names, cannot be understood but by knowing the particulars comprehended under them: And in the practical inftances, the measures must be taken from the knowledge of the actions themselves, and the rules of them, abstracted from words, and antecedent to the knowledge of names; which rules a man must know, what language foever he chance to learn, whether English or Japan, or if he fhould learn no language at all, or never fhould understand the use of words, as happens in the case of dumb and deaf men. When it shall be made out, that men ignorant of words, or untaught by the laws and cuftoms of their country, know that it is part of the worship of God not to kill another man, not to know more women than one, not to procure abortion, not to expofe their children, not to take from another what is his, though we want it ourselves, but, on the contrary, relieve and fupply his wants, and whenever we have done the contrary, we ought to repent, be forry, and refolve to do fo no more; when, I fay, all men fhall be proved actually to know and allow all these, and a thousand other fuch rules, all which come under these two general words made ufe of above, viz. Virtutes et peccata, Virtues and fins, there will be more reafon for admitting these and the like for common notions and practical principles. Yet after all, univerfal confent (were there any in moral principles) to truths, the knowledge whereof may be attained otherwife, would scarce prove them to be innate, which is all I contend for.

[ocr errors]

$20. Object. Innate Principles may be corrupted, anfwered.

NOR will it be of much moment here to offer that very ready, but not very material answer, viz. That the innate principles of morality may, by education and cuftom, and the general opinion of those amongst whom we converse, be darkened, and at last quite worn out of the minds of men; which affertion of theirs, if true, quite takes away the argument of univerfal confent, by which this opinion of innate principles is endeavoured to be proved, unless thofe men will think it reasonable that¦ their private perfuafions, or that of their party, fhould ¦ pafs for univerfal confent, a thing not unfrequently done, when men, prefuming themselves to be the only mafters of right reafon, caft by the votes and opinion of the rest of mankind, as not worthy the reckoning; and then their argument ftands thus: The principles which all mankind allow for true are innate; those that men of right reafon admit, are the principles allowed by all mankind; we, and thofe of our mind, are men of reason, therefore we agreeing, our principles are innate; which is a very pretty way of arguing, and a fhort cut to infallibility; for otherwise it will be very hard to understand how there be fome principles which all men do acknowledge and agree in, and yet there are none of thofe principles which are not by depraved cuftom and ill education blotted out of the minds of many men; which is to say, that all men admit, but yet many men do deny and diffent from them: And indeed the fuppofition of fuch first principles will ferve us to very little purpose, and we fhall be as much at a loss with as without them, if they may by any human power, fuch as is the will of our teachers, or opinions of our companions, be altered or loft in us; and notwithstanding all this boaft of first principles and innate light, we fhall be as much in the dark and uncertainty as if there were no fuch thing at all, it being all one to have no rule, and. one that will warp any way, or, amongst various and contrary rules, not to know which is the right. But concerning in

« ForrigeFortsæt »