Billeder på siden
PDF
ePub

Three examples have been given by him, all very neat. Writing interpretation of = only requires the finding a meaning for for shortness the differential equations thus, which is explained in my paper quoted to be any fundamental geometric magnitude of the curve itself. ALLAN CUNNINGHAM, Lt. Col., R.E.

Circle, R=0; Parabola, S = 0; Conic, T = 0,

he has proved (in Journ. As. Soc. Bengal, vol. Ivi. p. 144, and NATURE, vol. xxxviii. p. 173) that in general in any curve

[blocks in formation]

The verbal neatness of these interpretations can hardly be excelled.

A writer (R. B. II.) in NATURE, vol. xxxviii. p. 197, objects to the last that it really only means that a conic is a conic (because its aberrancy curve shrinks into the centre)! Now, this is precisely what was to be expected: the differential equation of a curve expresses exactly that the curve of some family which osculates it in the highest degree is the curve itself. But the new interpretation puts this in a neat form, viz. in assigning a meaning to the magnitude F, which differs from zero in general, and whose vanishing at all points of every curve of a certain family (say conic) indicates a property of high generality of

thog curves.

But the Professor makes, what I conceive to be, the mistaken claim (Proc. As. Soc. Bengal, 1888, p. 75, et seq.), that this mode of interpretation is the only true one; and further that, accepting this mode of interpretation, only one meaning can be attached to it (p. 76, 1. 29, op. cit.).

Now it must be observed that the equation F = 0 implies directly, not only that some one geometric magnitude F vanishes, but also that every geometric magnitude vanishing with F (such as aF, aFm, sinF, &c.) vanishes right round every curve of the family. All of these are equally good geometric interpretations of the same kind as proposed.

But the equation F =o also implies, more or less directly, countless theorems of position, osculation, &c. All of these

British Earthworms.

THE Occurrence of any new animal in England is a point of some interest, however humble that animal may be ; and, in order to work out the species of British earthworms, I sent a letter to the Field some time back, requesting readers of that journal to forward me specimens. In reply I received a large number of worms from various people, amongst them being Mr. F. O. Pickard Cambridge, of Hyde, who has very kindly sent me several parcels of worms. One of these parcels contained some very fine gravel taken from the bed of a stream, together with a number of small worms about 1 to 2 inches in length. These turned out to be a species of Allurus, a genus formed by Eisen for a worm in which the male pores are on the thirteenth segment instead of on the fifteenth, as in the other genera of the family Lumbricide. Only one species is at present known, viz, A. tetraï lrus ; it is of a beautiful sienna colour, with a dull orange clitellum. I wish to record, for the first time, its occurrence in England, and also to draw attention to the fact that it lives below water, at any rate for some part of the year. Mr. Cambridge has been most obliging in giving me the facts as to the place in which he found the worms: they occur in the gravelly bed of a stream which at certain times of the year runs down so low as to leave small gravelly islands 2 or 3 inches high. In these islands he found Allurus; but he finds none in the banks of the stream. We already know of Criodrilus as being a thoroughly aquatic earthworm, living in the muddy beds of rivers and lakes; and although this worm has not yet been recorded in Great Britain, I see no reason to doubt that it exists here.

I should add that Mr. Beddard has informed me that he received a specimen of Allurus from Lea, Kent, some time after I received these from Hyde. It has been recorded also from Sweden, Italy, and Tenerife. WM. B. BENHAM. University College.

THE SUN MOTOR.

may be fairly considered geometric meanings of that equation.INDIA, South America, and other countries interested

Thus, attending to the meaning of "aberrancy," the results quoted involve directly

(1) Circle.-Normal coincides with diameters.

(2) Parabola.-Diameters are axes of aberrancy, and meet at infinity.

(3) Conic.-Diameters are axes of aberrancy, and are concurrent (in the centre).

Surely these are also true geometric interpretations. Lastly, let the equation Fo be multiplied by any of its integrating factors μ, and write for shortness μFdx = P. It follows that = constant. Hence, since the number of integrating factors is infinite, another (indirect) geometric interpretation arises, viz. that all the geometric magnitudes are constant right round every curve of the family.

These latter general modes of interpretation, viz. theorems of position, osculation, and of first integrals (p = c), I had given eleven years ago (in Quart, Journ. Math., vol. xiv. p. 226).

To the last of these the Professor has objected (p. 76 of his paper quoted), that it is not an interpretation of the equation F= 0 at all, but only of its first integrals = c. This is, of course, admitted. But it is worth noting that the connection between the two, F = 0, c, is so very close, that many will accept an interpretation of the latter as a fair (indirect) interpretation of the former al-o.

=

=

of

In fact, since F = o is equivalent to D. o, the former is now seen to mean directly that there is no variation of any the magnitudes right round every curve of the family; and this is a strict direct interpretation of the equation Fo itself. But many will probably prefer the shorter phrase = constant, even though it interprets F =o only indirectly.

There is, moreover, a slight disadvantage in the former mode of interpretation, viz. that the meaning of the magnitude F must necessarily be sought in curves other than, and usually more complex than, the curves denoted by F = 0; whereas the

in the employment of sun power for mechanical purposes, have watched with great attention the result of recent experiments in France, conducted by M. Tellier, whose plan of actuating motive engines by the direct application of solar heat has been supposed to be more advantageous than the plan adopted by the writer of increasing the intensity of the solar rays by a series of reflecting mirrors. The published statements that "the heat-absorbing surface" of the French apparatus presents an area of 215 square feet to the action of the sun's rays, and that "the work done has been only 43,360 footpounds per hour," furnish data proving that Tellier's invention possesses no practical value.

The results of protracted experiments with my sun motors, provided with reflecting mirrors as stated, have established the fact that a surface of 100 square feet presented at right angles to the sun, at noon, in the latitude of New York, during summer, develops a mechanical energy reaching 1,850,000 foot-pounds per hour. The advocates of the French system of dispensing with the "cumbrous mirrors" will do well to compare the said amount with the insignificant mechanical energy represented by 43,360 foot-pounds per hour developed by 215 square feet of surface exposed to the sun by Tellier, during his experiments in Paris referred to.

The following brief description will give a clear idea of the nature and arrangement of the reflecting mirrors adopted by the writer for increasing the intensity of the solar heat which imparts expansive force to the medium propelling the working piston of the motive engine. Fig. I represents a perspective view of a cylindrical heater, and a frame supporting a series of reflecting mirrors composed of narrow strips of window-glass coated with

silver on the under side. The frame consists of a light structure of wrought iron or steel, provided with transverse ribs as shown by the illustration, each rib being accurately bent to a parabolic curvature whose focus coincides with the axis of the cylindrical heater. It needs hardly be stated that the mirrors supported by the said transverse ribs continue from side to side of the frame, which accordingly resembles a parabolic trough whose bottom is composed of mirrors. It will be readily understood that this trough with its bent ribs and flat mirrors forms a perfect parabolic reflector, to which a cylindrical heater, as stated, may be attached for generating steam or expanding the gases intended to actuate the piston of the motive engine. Regarding the mechanism for turning the reflector towards the sun, engineers are aware that various combinations based on the principle of the "universal joint" may be employed.

Concerning previous attempts made in France to utilize solar energy for mechanical purposes, it is well known that practical engineers, having critically examined Mouchot's solar engine, which M. Tellier proposes to supersede, find that it is incapable of developing sufficient power for any domestic purpose. Again, the

investigations carried out by order of the French Government to ascertain the merits of Mouchot's invention show that irrespective of the great expense of silverlined curved metallic reflectors for increasing the insufficient energy of direct solar radiation, these reflectors cannot be made on a sufficient scale for motors having adequate power to meet the demands of commerce; nor is it possible to overcome the difficulty of rapid wear of the delicate silver lining of the metallic reflectors conse quent on atmospheric influence, which after a few hours of exposure renders their surfaces tarnished and ineffective unless continually polished. A glance at the accon panying illustration (Fig. 1) shows that the reflector corstructed for my sun motor differs altogether from that originated by Mouchot, which Tellier's apparatus, tested at Paris, was intended to displace.

Description of the Illustrated Reflector.

(1) The mirrors which reflect the solar rays are devoid of curvature, being flat narrow strips of ordinary windowglass, cut to uniform width and length, perfectly straight. (2) The under sides of said strips are coated with silver by a process which prevents the action of the sun's rays

[graphic][subsumed]

from destroying the silver coating as in ordinary lookingglasses.

(3) The mirrors supported by the bent metallic ribs extending from side to side of the parabolic trough, are held down by the heads of small screws tapped into the ribs. Thin slats of wood may be introduced between the mirrors and the ribs-an expedient of some importance in localities where the reflector is exposed to high winds. (4) It needs no explanation that the reflecting surface of the mirrors cannot become tarnished by atmospheric influence, since the bright side of the silver coating is permanently protected by the glass; hence it will be only necessary to remove dust from the mirrors, an operation readily performed by feather brushes secured to light handles of suitable length.

(5) The frame of the reflector, being composed of rolled bars of iron or steel, requires no finish, excepting the top of the transverse ribs, which must correspond accurately with a given parabolic curvature. It should be observed that the needed accuracy is readily attained by a cutting tool guided by a bar of proper form.

(6) Regarding cost of construction, it will suffice to state that manufacturers of glass, both in the United

States and Germany, supply the mirrors, cut to exact size and silvered, at a rate of 60 cents. per square foot, the weight being 106 pounds per 100 square feet. Consequently the cost of the reflector and heater for the cun motor will not much exceed that of a steam boiler and appurtenances, including chimney. The cost of the engine apart from the reflector, will not be greater than that of an ordinary steam-engine.

(7) With reference to durability, it will be evident that the light metallic frame with its mirrors, and a heater acted upon only by reflected solar heat, will last much longer than steam boilers subjected to the action of fire, soot, and corrosion.

Let us now briefly consider the distinguishing feature of the sun motor-namely, the increase of the intensity of the sun's radiant energy by parallel rays and flat reflecting surfaces permanently protected against atmospheric influence. It has been supposed that the lens and the curved reflecting surface, by converging the sun's rays, could alone increase the intensity of radiant heat. But Newton's demonstration, showing that the temperature produced by solar radiation is as the density of the

rays," taught me to adopt in place of curved surfaces and converging rays, flat surfaces and parallel rays, as shown by Fig. 2, which represents a transverse section of part of the reflector. The direct vertical solar rays, it will be seen, act on the mirrors; while the reflected rays, divided into diagonal clusters of parallel rays, act on the heater, the surface of which will thus be exposed to a dense mass of reflected rays, and consequently raised to a temperature exceeding 600 F. at noon during ordinary sunshine.

The cost, durability, and mechanical energy of the sun motor being thus disposed of, it remains to be shown whether the developed energy is continuous, or whether the power of the engine changes with the increase and diminution of zenith distance and consequent variation of atmospheric absorption. Evidently an accurate knowedge of the diathermancy of the terrestrial atmosphere

is indispensable to determine whether the variation of the radiant energy is so great that the development of constant power becomes impracticable. Of course, manufacture and commerce demand a motor developing full power during a modern working day of eight hours. Observations relating to atmospheric diathermancy continued during a series of years, enable me to assert that the augmentation of solar intensity during the middle of the day is so moderate that by adopting the simple expedient of wasting a certain amount of the superabundant heat generated while the sun is near the meridian (as the steam engineer relieves the excess of pressure by opening the safety-valve) a uniform working power will be developed during the stipulated eight hours. The opening of the safety-valve, however, means waste of coal raised from a great depth at great cost, and possibly transported a long distance,

while the radiant heat wasted automatically by the sun motor is produced by fuel obtained from an inexhaustible storehouse free of cost and transportation.

It will be proper to mention that the successful trial of the sun motor described and illustrated in NATURE, vol. xxxi. p. 217, attracted the special attention of landowners on the Pacific coast then in search of power for actuating the machinery needed for irrigating their sun-burnt lands. But the mechanical detail connected with the concentration at a single point of the power developed by a series of reflectors was not perfected at the time; nor was the investigation relating to atmospheric diathermancy sufficiently advanced to determine with precision the retardation of the radiant heat caused by increased zenith distance. Consequently no contracts for building sun motors could then be entered into, a circumstance which greatly discouraged the enterprising Californian agriculturists prepared to carry out forthwith an extensive system of irrigation. In the meantime a simple method of concentrating the power of many reflectors at a given point has been perfected, while the retardation of solar energy caused by increased zenith distance has been accurately determined, and found to be so inconsiderable that it does not interfere with the development of constant solar power during the eight hours called for.

The new motor being thus perfected, and first-class manufacturing establishments ready to manufacture such machines, owners of the sun-burnt lands on the Pacific coast may now with propriety reconsider their grand scheme of irrigation by means of sun power.

[graphic]

ΟΝ

JOHN ERICSSON.

THE WHITE RACE OF PALESTINE.

N the occasion of my first visit to Palestine I was struck by the number of blue-eyed, fair-haired children whom I met with in the towns and villages, more especially in the mountainous parts of the country. At the time I supposed them to be the descendants of the Crusaders or of the other natives of Northern Europe who found their way to the Holy Land during the Middle Ages. But a new light has recently been thrown on the matter by the ethnological observations made by Mr. Flinders Petrie in Egypt.

The winter before last Mr. Petrie was commissioned by the British Association to take casts and photographs of the ethnological types represented on the Egyptian monuments, and to note, wherever it was possible, the colour of the skin, eyes, and hair. It was not the first time, however, that notes of the kind had been taken. Some years ago, Osburn, a careful observer, had noticed that in the sculptures of Ramses II. at Abu-Simbel "the Shasu of Kanana" were depicted with blue eyes, and red hair, eyebrows, and beard, and the Amaur with "the eyes blue, the eyebrows and beard red." As "the Shasu of Kanana" lived a little to the south of Hebron, while the Amaur are the Amorites of the Old Testament, it was clear that a population existed in Palestine in the fourteenth century before our era which had all the characteristics of the white race.

Mr. Petrie's observations have abundantly verified this conclusion. He finds that, on the walls of a Theban tomb, the chief of Kadesh on the Crontes is painted with a white skin, and light red-brown hair. Kadesh was the southern capital of the Hittites, after their invasion of Syria, but the Egyptian inscriptions describe it as being "in the land of Amaur"; and that its chief must have been an Amorite is shown by the fact that the Hittites are depicted with yellow or orange skins, their hair being black, and their eyes dark.

The physiognomy of the Hittites and Amorites, moreover, differed widely. The Egyptian artists agree with the native Hittite monuments in representing the former

with ugly protrusive profile, and Mongoloid features, the hair being arranged at the back of the head in a sort of "pig-tail." The Amaur or Amorites, on the other hand, are a handsome people, tall, and dolichocephalic, with large sub-aquiline noses, and a short pointed beard at the end of the chin. The defenders of "the fort of Amaur" are represented as having been burnt a light pink-red by the action of the sun. Otherwise the skin is white or "sallow."

We learn, then, from the ancient monuments of Egypt that a portion of Palestine was occupied by a white race before its conquest by the Israelites. And they further inform us that this white race continued to exist in the country after the conquest. The physical characteristics of the captives taken by Shishak in the time of Rehoboam from the cities of Judah have Amorite and not Jewish features. There is nothing in common between them and the tribute-bearers of Jehu, who are depicted on the black obelisk from Nimroud, now in the British Museum, with faces of a most typically Jewish cast. In the tenth century before our era, consequently, the bulk of the population in the southern part of Judæa must have been of Amorite origin.

It is not wonderful, therefore, if we find traces of the same population still surviving in Palestine. There is no need of explaining their existence by a theory of their descent from the Crusaders. The survival of the ancient white race of Palestine is parallel to the survival of the ancient white race of Northern Africa, now generally known among French writers under the name of Kabyles. The Kabyles were at one time imagined to be the descendants of the Vandals, but we now know that they have inhabited the southern coast of the Mediterranean since the later Neolithic age. They are the Libyans of antiquity, represented on the Egyptian monuments, like the Amorites, with white skins, blue eyes, and dolichocephalic skulls, and similarly described by classical writers. They extended into Teneriffe and the Canary Islands, and their long-headed skulls have been disinterred from the dolmens of Northern Africa.

To the traveller who sees them for the first time the Kabyles offer a striking appearance. Their clear white skins, covered with freckles, their blue eyes and light hair, remind him of the so-called "Red Kelts" he has met with in an Irish village. They bear a high reputation for physical courage and love of independence, though at the same time they seem to be an orderly people. But they have two characteristics which they share with the white race of Northern Europe. They are mountaineers, the climate of the African plains being apparently too hot for them, and they are distinguished by their tall stature.

grass

These were equally the characteristics of the Amorites of ancient Palestine. The Jews declared that their "height was like the height of the cedar," the Semitic tribes by the side of them seeming to be but " hoppers," and the iron couch of Og, the Amorite king of Bashan, preserved at Rabbath, afterwards the capital of Ammon, excited the wonder of later generations on account of its size.

The Amorites also occupied the whole of the mountainous district of Syria and Palestine from the neighbourhood of Kadesh in the north to the desert southward of Judah, and on the eastern side of the Jordan they founded the two kingdoms of Bashan and Heshbon. In the mountains of Moab and Seir they formed the aboriginal population, partially dispossessed by the Semitic tribes of Moab, Ammon, and Edom, and the name of Horite under which they went in Edom is best explained as meaning "white," in contradistinction to the Semitic Edomite or "red-man." A passage in the Pentateuch (Numbers xiii. 29) expressly states that along with the Hittites and Jebusites they inhabited the mountainous region, while the Canaanites dwelt on the coast and the

valley of the Jordan. That Jebusite simply means a cross between Hittite and Amorite is clear from the statement of Ezekiel (xvi. 3, 4, 5) that Jerusalem, whose old name of Jebus gave rise to that of Jebusite, was born of a Hittite mother and an Amorite father. The Egyp tian monuments bear witness to the same "interlocking" of Hittite and Amorite.

There is yet a third characteristic which has been ascribed to the white race of Northern Europe. It has been brought into close connection with the dolmens which cover so large a part of its territory. Faidherbe and others have traced a continuous line of dolmens of similar construction along the northern coast of Africa, through Spain, Portugal, and France, into the British Isles. No one, indeed, who has examined the famous dolmens of Roknia, in Algeria, can fail to be struck by their resemblance to the sepulchral cromlechs of our own country. If they are really due to the genius and influence of a single race, it would seem that the race moved from north to south, since the objects found in the dolmens of the south of France betray a more advanced stage of culture than those found in the north.

The chief objection hitherto raised against ascribing these dolmens to the white race with whom they are associated has been that similar megalithic monuments exist in Palestine. Over 700 have been discovered i Moab on the eastern side of the Jordan. Major Conder has drawn attention to others in the basaltic region is the neighbourhood of the ancient Dan, and though none have as yet been observed in Judah, this is probably due to the fact that the attention of travellers has not been called to them. I have myself come across a fine specimen on a hill to the south of Jenin which had been overlooked by the Palestine Survey, and that megalithic structures once existed in Judah is evident from the occurrence in the Old Testament of names like Gilgal or "Stone-circle," and Ai or "cairn" (Joshua viii. 29). It will be noticed that they are especially plentiful on the eastern side of the Jordan, where the two chief Amorite kingdoms once flourished. Just as the dolmens of Northern Africa were the burial-places of the ancestors of the Kabyles, so tradition affirmed that the Amorite king of Ai had been buried beneath a cairn of stones.

The discovery that the Amorites of Palestine were racially allied to the ancient Libyans opens up ethnolo gical and archæological questions of considerable interest. These cannot be touched upon here, but must be reserved for a future occasion. It is sufficient for the present to have drawn attention to a new and curious ethnological fact. A H. SAYCE

AT

ENGINEERING SCHOOLS.

Ta time when so much is being said about the need for technical education, especially in engineering, the following letter will be read with interest :

Engineering School, Trinity College, Dublin,
June 1888.

DEAR LORD ASHBOURNE,-As you have requested me to draw up a statement of the claims of engineering schools to be recognized by the Civil Service Commissioners as affording part at least of the technical training required of candidates for engineering Civil Service appointments, I send you the following account.

Allow me, in the first place, to state that I am not advocating the claims of our Engineering School bere as in any way distinct from that of many other excellent engineering schools that exist. For instance, the Indian Government is so fully convinced of the absolute necessity for a proper technical school training for engineers that it requires all candidates for Indian engineering appoint

ments to go through Cooper's Hill Engineering School; and yet the Home Civil Service do not in any way even recognize the very same technical training given to other students who stay at home as of any value at all.

The instruction given in engineering schools is of two kinds :

I. Lectures and demonstrations in mathematics, mechanics, physics, chemistry, geology, &c.; and in the theory and practice of engineering, surveying, &c., &c. II. Practical training

(a) Practical work in laboratories and workshops in mechanics, machines, physics, chemistry, and field-work in geology.

(b) Drawing and office work, including designing, making out specifications, taking out quantities, &c., &c. (c) Practical surveying, and all manner of field work. (d) Inspection of works in progress.

It will be observed what a large and important part of the training given in a school cannot be obtained in an office at all. All the instruction in mathematics, mechanics, physics, chemistry, geology, &c., and in the theory of engineering, and all the important practical laboratory training in these subjects, can only be obtained in a school; and unless an engineer has been properly and practically taught these things before entering on his profession, it is almost certain that he will never learn them. In the other more especially engineering parts of the course there are several great advantages in the school course over the office course. In the school, in the first place, the student is under the constant instruction of teachers whose time is devoted to instructing the student, and explaining to him the principles upon which his work depends; and, in the second place, the course of instruction covers as wide a range of subjects as is consistent with teaching each properly. In the office, in the first place, the apprentice has to pick up what instruction he can, and is generally content with a rule-of-thumb knowledge, that may desert him at any really critical juncture; and, in the second place, in any one office the work is yearly becoming more specialized, so that an apprentice will have experience of only a small range of subjects, and, not being acquainted with the theory of even these, will be incompetent to engage in other work. There are, of course, certain things, such as facility in numerical calculation, and perhaps in the use of fieldinstruments, acquaintance with the details of specifications in a particular class of work, familiarity with prices at a particular time, and an opportunity of seeing designs carried into execution, which cannot be as well obtained in school as on works The object of a school being to teach, and of works being to pay, neither can completely supply the place of the other. As a course of technical training for a young engineer, the school course is out of all proportion the more important. What can be learnt from the office course will certainly be acquired, while what can be learnt from the school course will hardly ever be acquired, unless learnt before beginning the practice of his profession. In this age of technical education it is practically certain that in a few years no engineer will be recognized as such unless he has had a proper technical school education, just as in the medical profession it has long ago been recognized that, without a proper medical school education, it is impossible for a doctor to learn the many sciences upon which the successful practice of his profession necessarily depends.

Eminent engineers who have had experience of students taught in engineering schools hold opinions similar to those here enunciated. Our late Professor of Engineering, Mr. Crawford, whose engineering experience is worldwide, is of this opinion. Mr. Bindon B. Stoney, Engineer to the Dublin Port and Docks Board, is of the same opinion. Both these have had experience of schooltrained students, and think that the proper course for a young engineer to pursue is to go through a course of

instruction in a properly-equipped school, and then to go for a year on works. They consider that a year on works is required to complete the education of an engineer, and they think that a short time on works is quite sufficient for a student who has already gone through an engineering school. Mr. Stoney, for instance, takes students who have been through an engineering school as apprentices for one year, although he will not take untrained apprentices for so short a term.

Foreign Governments in general require all who profess to practise as engineers to go through a proper technical school training, and it is a serious difficulty in the way of English engineers who endeavour to obtain employment on the Continent that, even though they may have been trained in an excellent school, yet this is not recognized by foreign Governments, because our engineering schools are in no way recognized by our own Government.

The Civil Service Commissioners should endeavour to encourage the proper scientific training of the engineers they receive into the public service, and they can do so by recognizing the years spent in an engineering school as equivalent to the same number of years of the technical training that is now required. In the more important appointments, which at present require five years' technical training, the candidate would have to supplement his school course by an office course of at least two years; and this, in the opinion of eminent engineers, as quoted above, would be amply sufficient. In the case of the less important appointments, the school training is probably much better than what satisfies the Commissioners at present; but if it is thought that the special qualifications of an office-trained apprentice are essential, they can be easily secured by requiring in every case at least one year's office experience.

The Civil Service Commissioners should, before recog nizing any engineering school as giving the instruction qualifying a candidate to compete for an appointment, inspect the school, and see that it is properly equipped, and has the means and teachers required to teach what it professes. For instance, in some schools there is no special instruction in architecture, and this special teaching should be required of any school that was recognized as qualifying candidates for specially architectural appointments. Similarly, in the case of mechanical engineering, some schools have not the means of teaching it properly, and these schools should not be recognized as qualifying candidates for specially mechanical engineering appointments. A school that teaches civil engineering should be recognized as such, and only as such; and similarly, one that only teaches mechanical engineering should be recognized only as such. In the case of medical appointments, the State recognition of schools is already fully carried out, so that there can be no insuperable difficulty in doing the same in the case of the engineering appointments.

if the Civil Service Commissioners require further information as to the instruction imparted in engineering schools, it would be well for them to inspect University College, London, the City and Guilds of London Institute, and Cooper's Hill, all of which are easy of access from London; and if they require further information they had better appoint some competent Committee to inspect and report to them generally as to the training given in engineering schools, and as to whether they give a technical training that the Civil Service Commissioners would recognize as equivalent to some years spent in an office; and, if not, how the schools should modify their courses so as to give this instruction. Statements as to the nature and value of instruction made by those interested in it and responsible for it are not so valuable as independent testimony.

In conclusion, I would earnestly press upon the Civil Service Commissioners the very great desirability of their encouraging scientifically-trained candidates to apply for

« ForrigeFortsæt »