I believe that the first development of thought in the child is very much disturbed by a wordy system of teaching, which is not adapted either to his faculties or the circumstances of his life. According to my experience, success depends upon whether... Education in the Nineteenth Century - Side 135redigeret af - 1901 - 274 siderFuld visning - Om denne bog
 | Frank Pierrepont Graves - 1913 - 444 sider
...what they had learned by their own observation. With regard to this whole method Pestalozzi said : "I believe that the first development of thought in...true through being closely connected with their own observation. As a general rule, I attached little importance to the study of words, even when explanations... | |
 | Frank Pierrepont Graves - 1915 - 574 sider
...were taught to corroborate what they had learned by their own observation. About this method he said: "According to my experience, success depends upon...true through being closely connected with their own observation. As a general rule, I attached little importance to the study of words, even when explanations... | |
 | Michael Vincent O'Shea - 1921 - 488 sider
...know how to read when reading is useful to him. Until then, it serves only to annoy him." Rousseau. "I believe that the first development of thought in...true through being closely connected with their own observation. As a general rule, I attached little importance to the study of words, even when explanations... | |
 | Michael Vincent O'Shea - 1924 - 584 sider
...Pestalozzi protested against the practice in his day of requiring pupils to learn the contents of books. He says : "I believe that the first development of thought...true through being closely connected with their own observation. As a general rule, I attached little importance to the study of words, even when explanations... | |
 | Sister Marie Louis Hummel - 1924 - 138 sider
...can in many cases be had first-hand. In a letter written to a friend on his work at Stanz he says: "According to my experience, success depends upon...connected with their own personal observation and experience."20 Does not Pestalozzi here imply the idea of apperception? Is not the meaning of the passage... | |
| |